By Ashfaq Baig 
The specter of United States intervention in Latin America is not merely a historical footnote. It is, rather, a persistent theme in regional politics. Now, in the current geopolitical climate, a significant concern is resurfacing: Is the US preparing its next target in its southern neighborhood? Recent actions, coupled with heightened rhetoric, suggest a definitive shift. Washington’s focus on the hemisphere seems to have sharpened considerably, moving away from past decades of perceived “benign neglect.” Therefore, vigilance is paramount. Latin American
The Ghost of Interventions Past Latin American
History provides a crucial backdrop. We must remember the long, often painful, history of US involvement in Latin America. Throughout the 20th century, the US undertook numerous military interventions and supported coup d’états. Consequently, this legacy of interference has left deep scars. Countries like Chile, Guatemala, and Nicaragua, among others, experienced destabilization. Their political trajectories were altered to favor US interests, particularly during the Cold War.
Furthermore, this history shapes the present. Therefore, when the US deploys military assets or imposes aggressive sanctions, it triggers a collective memory in the region. Leaders and citizens alike view such actions not in isolation, but through the lens of a long-standing pattern of projecting power. This deep-seated distrust is the first major hurdle for any new US policy.
Venezuela: The Center of the Storm Latin American
Currently, the most intense focus of US attention is undoubtedly Venezuela. The Trump administration has significantly escalated pressure on the government of President Nicolás Maduro. This pressure takes multiple forms. First, there are the economic sanctions, which have been in place for years, targeting key sectors like oil and finance. These measures aim to restrict the regime’s revenue.
More recently, however, the actions have become increasingly militarized. The administration has declared certain drug cartels operating in the region to be “unlawful combatants.” Moreover, it has linked the Venezuelan regime to these groups. Consequently, this designation provides a potential legal justification for military action. Subsequently, the US has deployed military assets, including warships and fighter jets, to the Southern Caribbean. These moves are officially framed as counter-narcotics operations.
However, the reality is far more tense. Reports of kinetic strikes on civilian boats in the Caribbean, allegedly transporting drugs, have drawn international condemnation. Furthermore, there are open discussions within Washington about the possibility of targeted strikes inside Venezuelan territory or even an all-out effort at regime change. Venezuelan leaders, in turn, have responded with their own military mobilizations, accusing the US of aggressive designs. Therefore, Venezuela currently stands at the very real risk of becoming the next major point of conflict.
Mexico: The Uncomfortable “Partner” Latin American
While Venezuela faces the most direct military pressure, Mexico remains a constant focus of US security concerns. The border relationship, inherently complex, has become increasingly fraught. The main flashpoint is the rampant issue of drug cartels and the trafficking of fentanyl into the US.
In this context, the Trump administration has designated major Mexican cartels as “terrorist organizations.” This action is highly significant because it potentially opens the door to direct US military operations within Mexico. Although Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has committed to tougher measures against cartels, the threat of unilateral US action remains.
Furthermore, the pressure extends beyond security. The US has threatened to impose massive tariffs on Mexican imports. This leverage is explicitly used to force Mexico to comply with US demands on migration and cartel suppression. Thus, Mexico finds itself in an incredibly difficult position, constantly making concessions to avoid further escalation. The sheer economic dependency makes it vulnerable. Therefore, the relationship is less one of equal partners and more of a highly strained, unequal alliance.
The New Geopolitical Calculus: China and Russia
The renewed US focus on Latin America is not solely about drug trafficking or specific regimes. Indeed, it is inextricably linked to the broader competition with global rivals, namely China and Russia. Washington views the increasing influence of these great powers in its “backyard” as a critical national security threat.
China’s economic footprint has expanded rapidly across Latin America. For instance, it is a major investor in infrastructure, technology, and natural resources. Consequently, this commercial engagement has translated into political influence. The US views these deepening ties with suspicion. Therefore, Washington is actively seeking to counter this encroachment.
Similarly, Russia maintains diplomatic and military ties with certain anti-US regimes, notably Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. This presence, although smaller than China’s, is viewed by US strategists as a deliberate attempt to sow instability. As a result, US policy is increasingly geared towards reasserting its dominance. This great power competition provides a strategic justification for greater intervention and less tolerance for regimes that challenge US hegemony.
Tools of Pressure: Beyond the Bomb Latin American
The US employs a wide array of tools to exert influence. It is important to note that military intervention is the most extreme option. Before that, however, the US utilizes a powerful arsenal of non-kinetic measures.
First and foremost are the economic sanctions. As seen with Venezuela and Cuba, these sanctions can cripple a nation’s economy, making it difficult to trade, borrow money, or access international banking. Furthermore, they are highly flexible, allowing the US Treasury to target specific individuals, entities, or entire sectors.
Secondly, the US employs designations of terrorism and transnational crime. Labeling groups like Venezuela’s Cartel de los Soles or Mexican cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) is a potent tool. This gives the US legal cover to pursue them globally and enables greater intelligence sharing and, critically, military engagement.
Finally, there is diplomatic isolation and visa restrictions. The US frequently uses the threat of isolation to pressure regional leaders. Consequently, this tactic aims to delegitimize adversaries on the international stage, making it harder for them to conduct normal foreign relations. These combined tools create a suffocating environment for targeted nations.
The Consequences of Escalation
Any escalation, whether economic or military, carries significant risks. Firstly, military action, particularly in Venezuela, could easily spiral into a protracted, low-intensity conflict. Venezuela is a country flooded with various armed groups, and an invasion could unite disparate factions against a common enemy: the “Yankees.” Furthermore, such a conflict would inevitably destabilize neighboring countries like Colombia and Brazil, leading to massive refugee flows.
Secondly, aggressive actions fuel anti-American sentiment across the entire continent. Indeed, every act of military force or aggressive rhetoric gives opponents of the US a powerful narrative of neocolonialism. This pushes regional partners towards China and Russia, the very outcome the US seeks to avoid.
Finally, the focus on security often overshadows other critical areas. Therefore, pressing issues like climate change, economic inequality, and democratic stability receive less attention. A purely security-driven approach risks alienating the youth and civil society, creating long-term instability. The ultimate cost, consequently, may be the loss of soft power and moral authority in a region that has historically looked to the US for leadership.
A Turning Point
The question of whether the US is eyeing its next Latin American target seems to have a clear, if unsettling, answer. Yes, the current administration has demonstrated a clear intent to elevate military and political pressure on the region, with Venezuela being the most acute focus. This is driven by three main factors: addressing drug trafficking, controlling migration, and countering the influence of China and Russia.
The current strategy relies heavily on sanctions, military posturing, and the aggressive use of terrorist designations. However, this path is highly perilous. It risks repeating the errors of the past, provoking regional conflict, and ultimately undermining US influence. In conclusion, the coming months will be a crucial test of whether Washington can re-engage with Latin America as a true partner, or whether it will once again default to a policy of coercion and intervention. The stability of the Western Hemisphere hangs in the balance.
Read More Articles Click Here.