A very serious event happened in the waters near Venezuela (US Navy). The White House has confirmed that a US Navy Admiral ordered a second deadly boat strike. This strike happened as part of a mission to stop drug trafficking. This is not the first strike. It follows other actions taken against boats accused of smuggling drugs.
This confirmation by the White House is very important. It tells the public who gave the order for the strike. This raises many questions about the military rules used. It also increases the tension between the US and the government of Venezuela. Lawmakers and the public are now demanding clear answers about these deadly military operations. US Navy
The Context: The Anti-Narcotics Mission US Navy
The United States has increased its military presence near Venezuela. The official reason is a strong mission to fight drug trafficking. Narcotics are illegal drugs. The US military is trying to stop these drugs from reaching American shores. US Navy
Increased Military Force: The US has sent many warships and large aircraft to the Caribbean Sea. This is a massive military operation. The size of the force is very big. US Navy
Previous Strikes: The deadly strikes started recently. They targeted small boats. The US military believes these boats have run by drug cartels. A cartel is a criminal organization. These strikes have resulted in several deaths. The US government argues that these actions are legal because they are fighting criminals who threaten the US homeland. US Navy
The New White House Confirmation US Navy
The White House statement focused on who ordered the second strike. Knowing who ordered the strike is key for accountability. Accountability means knowing who is responsible for the actions.
The Admiral’s Role: The White House confirmed that a US Navy Admiral gave the order. An Admiral is a very high-ranking military officer. This shows that the decision to use force has made at a very high level within the military command structure.
Formal Command: The decision has likely given within the command of the U.S. Southern Command. This command is responsible for all US military operations in Central and South America.
The Reason for Confirmation: The White House shared this information because lawmakers and the media were demanding answers. There is a lot of public concern about the high number of deaths in these strikes. The public wants to know why the US military is sinking boats and killing people instead of simply arresting them.
The Issue of the Rules of Engagement US Navy
The most difficult question in this situation is the Rules of Engagement. These rules tell military personnel when they have allowed to shoot and use deadly force.
When has Force Allowed? Normally, the military uses deadly force only when they have directly threatened. If they have shot at, they can shoot back. In the counter-narcotics mission, the rules might be different.
The “Insurrection Act” Argument: Some reports suggest the US government is treating the drug cartels as military enemies. This means the US might be using rules often reserved for wartime. If the cartels have treated as hostile forces, the military has more freedom to use deadly force.
Legal Debate: Legal experts are fighting over this. Many experts believe these strikes are illegal. They say that drug trafficking should handled by police and the Coast Guard. They say that killing people on boats without a trial is not proper law enforcement. The confirmation that an Admiral gave the order puts the military command directly under scrutiny.
The Venezuelan Response US Navy
The government of Venezuela is very angry about these strikes.
Violation of Sovereignty: Venezuela says the US military presence is a direct violation of their national rights. They say the US is using its military to intimidate them. They view the entire operation as a hostile act.
Political Attack: Venezuela argues that the anti-drug mission is fake. They say the real goal of the US is to remove President Nicolás Maduro from power. They believe the US is using the drug issue as an excuse for military action.
The strikes increase the tension between the two countries. Venezuela continues to hold its own military drills in response. This creates a very dangerous situation in the Caribbean.
The Oversight and Accountability Demands
The confirmation of the Admiral’s order will not end the debate. It will only make the demands for accountability louder.
Lawmaker Questions: US Senators and Representatives are asking the White House for detailed briefings. They want to see the exact Rules of Engagement being used. This want to know why the boats were not simply stopped and searched. They want to know if the military tried other methods first.
Risk of Escalation: Many lawmakers fear these deadly strikes could lead to a bigger war. If the US military accidentally hits a Venezuelan military boat, the conflict could grow out of control very fast. Oversight is needed to reduce this risk.
The Role of the CIA: The confirmation also comes after reports that the US has allowed the CIA to run covert operations in Venezuela. Covert means secret. The mix of military strikes and secret spy operations shows a very aggressive strategy by the US government.
The White House confirmation
The White House confirmation that a US Navy Admiral ordered the second deadly boat strike near Venezuela is a major disclosure. It confirms that the decision to use lethal force is being made at the highest levels of the military. While the US insists the strikes are necessary to fight drug cartels, the actions are causing high political tension with Venezuela. The controversy over the Rules of Engagement is ongoing. Lawmakers are demanding full transparency to ensure that the US military is operating legally and to prevent a dangerous escalation of conflict in the region. The security of the Caribbean depends on resolving these critical questions.
Read More Articles Click Here. Read Previous Articles Click Here. Inspired by BBC News.
